403.
Credit: Jamesboy Nuchaikong / Shutterstock
In 2021, I was developing software for an aerospace manufacturer and met with our machine learning team to discuss innovative approaches for tracking FOD (free-orbiting debris), a major security and operational concern in the industry. What struck me wasn’t the algorithms or tracking equipment, but the terabytes of data (up to petabytes) that were being produced.
Old-school problems of limited hardware resources and inefficient data compression were bottlenecking cutting-edge visual learning models and traditional tracking solutions alike. The team was smart and could fine-tune quickly, but the real challenge was making sure our infrastructure could scale with them.
In aerospace, performance hinges on how fast systems can absorb and interpret massive telemetry streams, and storage is often the silent limiter. When you’re generating terabytes to petabytes of data in a single test cycle, even a brief stall in the storage layer becomes a bottleneck. A few milliseconds of delay between what’s happening and what the system can write, index, or retrieve doesn’t just slow things down. It can compound through an entire run.
Traditional databases were built around disk constraints and batch workloads. But what happens when those limits no longer define what’s possible?
Diskless architectures sidestep traditional constraints by separating compute from storage and removing local persistence from the critical path. Data is ingested and indexed in memory for immediate availability, while object storage provides the durable, elastic foundation underneath. The result is a database that accelerates both ingestion and retrieval without sacrificing persistence.
This design offers the best of both worlds: the elasticity and durability of object storage with the speed of in-memory caching. Compute and storage scale independently. Systems can scale continuously, recover automatically, and adapt to changing workloads without planned downtime or manual intervention.
Diskless design means data can be ingested, queried, and acted upon in real-time without trade-offs between cost, performance, and scale.
Traditional databases were built around disk constraints and transactional workloads, where latency between ingestion and retrieval doesn’t matter much. But for time series workloads, whether it’s telemetry, observability, IoT, industrial, or physical AI systems, that latency becomes the difference between insight and incident.
登录后解锁全文,体验收藏、点赞、评论等完整功能
立即登录
2 小时前
403.Cloud providers are chasing agentic AI while core infrastructure remains unfinished. As outages, complexity, and platform inconsistency become har...

2 小时前
403.OpinionA blueprint for using AI to strengthen democracyAI is changing what it means to be a democratic citizen. Here’s how we can harness it for g...

5 小时前
403.OpenAI could be preparing to enter the hardware space with its first AI-focused smartphone, according to TF Securities analyst Ming Chi Kuo . The ...

16 小时前
403.Image model releases are driving growth for AI mobile apps, generating 6.5 times more downloads than traditional model updates, according to a new...

18 小时前
403.Bret Taylor’s AI startup Sierra is raising a $950 million funding round led by Tiger Global and GV, the company announced Monday , pushing its pos...

18 小时前
403.Two days before the Elon Musk vs. OpenAI trial began last week, Musk texted the model maker’s president and co-founder Greg Brockman. Musk suggest...

22 小时前
美国AI安全与研发公司Anthropic近日宣布,联合全球另类资产管理巨头黑石、头部私募机构Hellman & Friedman、国际投行高盛共同成立全新企业级AI服务公司。新公司将聚焦各行业中型企业需求,将Anthropic旗下大语言模型Claude落地到企业核心业务场景,首批Anthropic应用AI工程师已确认入驻新公司核心团队。

1 天前
近期全球AI赛道动作密集,OpenAI推进GPT-5研发、微软Copilot商业化覆盖超1亿用户、谷歌Gemini多模态能力迭代、苹果Apple Intelligence完成端侧部署适配,国产厂商DeepSeek、Perplexity等也在垂直场景跑出差异化优势,端侧大模型渗透率预计2025年将突破40%,行业已进入技术落地与场景渗透的关键期。